Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Illinois

Church Creek

Arlington Heights, IL · ~154 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Church Creek runs at 509% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Church Creek: 19.4 TCR = 509% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Church Creek safety composite

Church Creek scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2024

Church Creek injury rate improved

Church Creek's TCR fell 2.6 from 6.6 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 42.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.6 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=42.2 · 2022=31.7 · 2023=22.6 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Arlington Heights, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 19.4 · 509% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #246/265
  • PHOTO Amethyst Arbor
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amethyst Arbor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Church Creek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Church Creek averages 19.4 TCR (509% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Church Creek TCR series: 2017=6.6 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=42.2 · 2022=31.7 · 2023=22.6 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Church Creek falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #246 safest of 265 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Church Creek (154 employees, TCR 19.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Church Creek
Church Creek (154 employees, TCR 19.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Church Creek has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2023 22.6 21.3 2 15 0
2022 31.7 26.6 6 19 0
2020 42.2 40.7 7 48 0
2019 9.2 4.9 13 0 0
2017 6.6 5.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IL · Arlington Heights

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 121 employers in Arlington Heights, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amethyst Arbor 19.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crawfordsville Bickford 19.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joshua Springs Senior Living 19.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Place Supportive Living- Alton 19.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 118 - South Capitol Bridge Builders 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harold O'shea Builders 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peoria Corn Plant 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Gibson City 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northwest Community Hospital 3,365 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARLINGTON HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT 25 911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4813-48130002-ENCORE CHICAGO 845 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lutheran Home and Serv For The Aged 796 FTE
NAT-TCR Crestwood American River 19.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01245 19.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kre-Bsl Husky Bedford Operation LLC 19.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Valley Training Center Merced 19.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sutphen Corporation 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Construction Southwest of California, Inc 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Renaissance Dallas Hotel 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE OB Portland 5 Inc 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.