Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Massachusetts

CIL Electroplating Inc

Lawrence, MA · ~45 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CIL Electroplating Inc runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade A.

CIL Electroplating Inc: 0.8 TCR = 23% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CIL Electroplating Inc safety composite

CIL Electroplating Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

CIL Electroplating Inc injury rate improved

CIL Electroplating Inc's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.6 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Lawrence, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #2/26
  • PHOTO Southwestern Plating…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southwestern Plating Co., Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

CIL Electroplating Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CIL Electroplating Inc averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CIL Electroplating Inc TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where CIL Electroplating Inc falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 26 Electroplating metals and form employers in Massachusetts.

CIL Electroplating Inc (45 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CIL Electroplating Inc
CIL Electroplating Inc (45 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

CIL Electroplating Inc has fewer employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.1 0.0 0 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · MA · Lawrence

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 77 employers in Lawrence, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southwestern Plating Co., Inc 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bowman 2631 E. 126th Street 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GUARANTEED FINISHING 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plating for Electronics, LLC 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Resinate, Inc. - Douglas 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canal Generating LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE NORTHAMPTON-MA32 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE WILMINGTON-MA57 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAWRENCE GENERAL HOSPITAL 1,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence 730 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Manufacturing 728 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Balance Athletics Lawrence Mill 723 FTE
NAT-TCR Customer Service Group Robesonia Velocity Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mound City 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Center Management Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Estee Lauder - PADC 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fayetteville FTV 2 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1180LKQ Self Serve Tampa 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3098 Keystone Jacksonville 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mobile Mob 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.