Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · North Carolina

Fayetteville FTV 2

Fayetteville, NC · ~45 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fayetteville FTV 2 runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade C.

Fayetteville FTV 2: 4.4 TCR = 97% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fayetteville FTV 2 safety composite

Fayetteville FTV 2 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2016→2024

Fayetteville FTV 2 injury rate improved

Fayetteville FTV 2's TCR fell 5.5 from 7.8 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.8 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Fayetteville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 97% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #79/164
  • PHOTO R+L Carriers - MEM
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R+L Carriers - MEM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Fayetteville FTV 2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fayetteville FTV 2 averages 4.4 TCR (97% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fayetteville FTV 2 TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=6 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Fayetteville FTV 2 falls in its industry

3,020 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 164 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in North Carolina.

Fayetteville FTV 2 (45 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fayetteville FTV 2
Fayetteville FTV 2 (45 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Fayetteville FTV 2 has fewer employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2023 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2022 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2019 8.2 8.2 4 0 0
2018 4.1 4.1 2 0 0
2016 7.8 7.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · NC · Fayetteville

3,020 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 317 employers in Fayetteville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R+L Carriers - MEM 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR XLU 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reno NV FXFE-RNO 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR R+L Carriers - SGR 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Happy Holiday Christmas Trees 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cracon, Inc. 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE GOMEZ HARVESTING 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewisville Operations Center 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Fear Valley Health System/Cumberland County 5,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company - Fayetteville 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Cumberland 2,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Fayetteville 2,044 FTE
NAT-TCR Hale Ho'ola Hamakua 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR A&R Services 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Production Services - Jackson 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tithonus Tyrone 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mobile Mob 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mold-Tech Michigan 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE CIL Electroplating Inc 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1180LKQ Self Serve Tampa 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.