Printing, digital (e.g., billboards, other large format graphical materials, high resolution) (except books, grey goods) · Massachusetts

Circle Graphics - Hingham

Hingham, MA · ~25 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Circle Graphics - Hingham runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Printing, digital (e.g., billboards, other large format graphical materials, high resolution) (except books, grey goods) workplace, earning a grade F.

Circle Graphics - Hingham: 7.3 TCR = 222% of Printing, digital (e.g., billboards, other large format graphical materials, high resolution) (except books, grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Circle Graphics - Hingham safety composite

Circle Graphics - Hingham scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Circle Graphics - Hingham: 3.9 → 10.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 10.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.47× in 2017

Circle Graphics - Hingham's TCR rose 6.9 from 3.9 in 2016 to 10.8 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Hingham, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 222% of ind

  • DART 10.8 DART
  • RANK #38/40
  • PHOTO The Ohio Art Company
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Ohio Art Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Circle Graphics - Hingham in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Circle Graphics - Hingham averages 7.3 TCR (222% of the Printing, digital (e.g., billboards, other large format graphical materials, high resolution) (except books, grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Circle Graphics - Hingham TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=10.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Circle Graphics - Hingham falls in its industry

2,001 Printing, digital (e.g., billb establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 40 Printing, digital (e.g., billb employers in Massachusetts.

Circle Graphics - Hingham (25 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Circle Graphics - Hingham
Circle Graphics - Hingham (25 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Circle Graphics - Hingham has fewer employees than the Printing, digital (e.g., billboards, oth median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 10.8 10.8 2 0 0
2016 3.9 3.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MA · Hingham

2,001 Printing, digital (e.g., billboards, other large format graphical materials, high resolution) (except books, grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 41 employers in Hingham, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Ohio Art Company 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gateway Press, Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR B2Sign Group Texas Corporation 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superpac Incorporated 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE GREAT BARRINGTON-MA11 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE HANOVER-MA12 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Marshfield 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knollmeyer Building Corp. - 01 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linden Ponds 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hingham Manufacturing 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR McDonald Electrical Corp 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Russelectric, A Siemens Business 247 FTE
NAT-TCR CB103 - Hoffman Estates, IL 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Quikrete - HOUS 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amarillo (Txama) 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mahoning Valley (Ohmah) 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Nurseries, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3105 Republic Services of South Carolina, Hilton Head 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCT - Sharonville 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCR - Dayton 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.