Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Citrus Heights Terrace

Citrus Heights, CA · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Citrus Heights Terrace runs at 217% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Citrus Heights Terrace: 8.3 TCR = 217% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Citrus Heights Terrace safety composite

Citrus Heights Terrace scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.5

2017→2023

Citrus Heights Terrace injury rate improved

Citrus Heights Terrace's TCR fell 12.5 from 16.4 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.4 · 2018=4.4 · 2023=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Citrus Heights, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 217% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #252/635
  • PHOTO Brookdale Roseburg
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Roseburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Citrus Heights Terrace in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Citrus Heights Terrace averages 8.3 TCR (217% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Citrus Heights Terrace TCR series: 2017=16.4 · 2018=4.4 · 2023=3.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Citrus Heights Terrace falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #252 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Citrus Heights Terrace (33 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Citrus Heights Terrace
Citrus Heights Terrace (33 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Citrus Heights Terrace has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2018 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2017 16.4 8.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Citrus Heights

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 65 employers in Citrus Heights, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Roseburg 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Waterford at Wisconsin Rapids 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Senior Living Eden Prairie 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wickshire Port St. Lucie 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR On My Own Independent Living Services - Citrus Heights 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3712 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3712 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0771 - CITRUS HEIGHTS CA WHSE 278 FTE
NAT-TCR West Salem Store 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Advocate South Suburban Hospital 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100681 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-115-Morristown ( RK-115 ) 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kois Brothers Equipment Co 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4501 Little Rock Gateway Tire of Little Rock 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE DLHG, Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE NH.SALEM.1 - Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.