Public property management services, government · Oregon

City of Albany Building Maintenence

Albany, OR · ~3 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Albany Building Maintenence runs at 152% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Public property management services, government workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Albany Building Maintenence: 4.9 TCR = 152% of Public property management services, government BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Albany Building Maintenence safety composite

City of Albany Building Maintenence scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

City of Albany Building Maintenence held a steady TCR band

City of Albany Building Maintenence's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 77.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=77.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=34.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Albany, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 152% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/43
  • PHOTO Town of Avon - Polic…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~3 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Town of Avon - Police Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

City of Albany Building Maintenence in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Albany Building Maintenence averages 4.9 TCR (152% of the Public property management services, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Albany Building Maintenence TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=77.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=34.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Albany Building Maintenence falls in its industry

1,496 Public property management ser establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 43 Public property management ser employers in Oregon.

City of Albany Building Maintenence (3 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Albany Building Maintenence
City of Albany Building Maintenence (3 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

City of Albany Building Maintenence has fewer employees than the Public property management services, gov median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 34.1 34.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 77.2 38.6 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · OR · Albany

1,496 Public property management services, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 163 employers in Albany, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Town of Avon - Police Department 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guilford County Local Government 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington County North Shop 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Rancho Cucamonga 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cala Farms, Inc. 3 FTE
STATE-SIZE MPR Logistics LLC (Hillsboro) 3 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Treatment Plant 2 FTE
STATE-SIZE Madras Satelite 4 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0558 - Albany DC 1,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0558 - Albany OR DC 1,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linn-Benton Community College 1,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATI Millersburg Operations 896 FTE
NAT-TCR Lamothermic Corporation 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR North Texas Door 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR OC Concrete, LLC 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pomp's Tire - Channahon 041 4.9 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.