General services departments, government · North Carolina

City of Asheville Development Services

Asheville, NC · ~57 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Asheville Development Services runs at 139% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Asheville Development Services: 4.4 TCR = 139% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Asheville Development Services safety composite

City of Asheville Development Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Asheville Development Services: 0.0 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2024

City of Asheville Development Services's TCR rose 5.3 from 0.0 in 2021 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Asheville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 139% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #59/105
  • PHOTO Weiss Center
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Weiss Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

City of Asheville Development Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Asheville Development Services averages 4.4 TCR (139% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Asheville Development Services TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Asheville Development Services falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 105 General services departments, employers in North Carolina.

City of Asheville Development Services (57 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Asheville Development Services
City of Asheville Development Services (57 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

City of Asheville Development Services has fewer employees than the General services departments, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 2.6 2 0 0
2023 6.7 6.7 3 0 0
2022 5.8 1.9 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · NC · Asheville

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Weiss Center 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recreacion y Deportes 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Hall 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pekin Park District 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Division 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirlin Builders 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cape Romain / McLean A Joint Venture 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Engineered Steel Products 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR Detwiler'S Farm Market, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Knight Electric, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Apple Packers Quincy 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR H2O innovation Operation & Maintenance LLC - Long Beach O&M 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Highline Electric Association 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C553 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weaver Superior Walls, LLC 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.