Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers · Texas

Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157

Dallas, TX · ~57 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157 runs at 217% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157: 4.8 TCR = 217% of Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157 safety composite

Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2021→2024

Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157 injury rate improved

Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157's TCR fell 5.7 from 5.7 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.7 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.8 · 217% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #90/149
  • PHOTO Gator Orlando
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gator Orlando (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157 averages 4.8 TCR (217% of the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157 TCR series: 2021=5.7 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157 falls in its industry

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 149 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe employers in Texas.

Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157 (57 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157
Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157 (57 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Dakota Hardwoods Dallas #157 has more employees than the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.8 4.1 5 0 0
2022 6.5 4.9 4 0 0
2021 5.7 1.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · TX · Dallas

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gator Orlando 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kamco Building Supply Corp, Alexandria 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Prairie 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4183 GREENSBORO MILLWORK 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Tyler Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Waco Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Natural Resources Cedar Lake location 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE CKJ Transport - Energy Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Buffalo and Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR United Industrial Textile Products 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR NW Works Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR BHSM Rehabilitation, LLC (d/b/a Banner Rehabilitation Hospital - West) 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Weaver Superior Walls, LLC 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C553 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Asheville Development Services 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCS Trucking & Freight Inc. 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.