Parks and recreation commission, government · Virginia

City of Charlottesville-Parks

Charlottesville, VA · ~46 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Charlottesville-Parks runs at 541% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Parks and recreation commission, government workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Charlottesville-Parks: 17.3 TCR = 541% of Parks and recreation commission, government BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Charlottesville-Parks safety composite

City of Charlottesville-Parks scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2019

City of Charlottesville-Parks injury rate improved

City of Charlottesville-Parks's TCR fell 3.0 from 20.6 in 2016 to 17.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 23.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.6 · 2017=7.7 · 2018=23.5 · 2019=17.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Charlottesville, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.3 · 541% of ind

  • DART 7.5 DART
  • RANK #24/24
  • PHOTO DPW Parks Division
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DPW Parks Division (0.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

City of Charlottesville-Parks in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Charlottesville-Parks averages 17.3 TCR (541% of the Parks and recreation commission, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Charlottesville-Parks TCR series: 2016=20.6 · 2017=7.7 · 2018=23.5 · 2019=17.6 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Charlottesville-Parks falls in its industry

413 Parks and recreation commissio establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 24 Parks and recreation commissio employers in Virginia.

City of Charlottesville-Parks (46 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Charlottesville-Parks
City of Charlottesville-Parks (46 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

City of Charlottesville-Parks has fewer employees than the Parks and recreation commission, governm median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 17.6 7.5 6 1 0
2018 23.5 9.4 6 4 0
2017 7.7 5.1 2 1 0
2016 20.6 15.4 6 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · VA · Charlottesville

413 Parks and recreation commission, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 269 employers in Charlottesville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DPW Parks Division 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Echo Park Pool 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kankakee Valley Park District 16.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benton County Natural Areas, Parks, and Events 16.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE BRUNSWICK COUNTY POWER STATION 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE 202-NiSource-Staunton VA 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs BIA-Dulles Rail-VA 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huang's Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia 11,898 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Of Virginia (209) Health System 10,653 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia Medical Center 8,738 FTE
CITY-NEAR UVA Medical Center 7,268 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbia Cottage - Hanover 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0020-0022-00719 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Happy Valley #009 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR KCMO Turf/Prune 17.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE DAL 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE 49231i - Fresno Bulk 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gulf Compress 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE TLC Home Health of Ohio, In. (Branch) 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.