Ambulance and fire service combined · Illinois

City of Chicago Heights Fire Department

Chicago Heights, IL · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Chicago Heights Fire Department runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Ambulance and fire service combined workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Chicago Heights Fire Department: 4.6 TCR = 145% of Ambulance and fire service combined BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Chicago Heights Fire Department safety composite

City of Chicago Heights Fire Department scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Chicago Heights Fire Department: 2.1 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 6.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.52× in 2023

City of Chicago Heights Fire Department's TCR rose 2.7 from 2.1 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Chicago Heights, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 145% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #43/262
  • PHOTO Fire Department
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fire Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

City of Chicago Heights Fire Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Chicago Heights Fire Department averages 4.6 TCR (145% of the Ambulance and fire service combined BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Chicago Heights Fire Department TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=4.8 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Chicago Heights Fire Department falls in its industry

793 Ambulance and fire service com establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 262 Ambulance and fire service com employers in Illinois.

City of Chicago Heights Fire Department (61 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Chicago Heights Fire Department
City of Chicago Heights Fire Department (61 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

City of Chicago Heights Fire Department has more employees than the Ambulance and fire service combined median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.8 2.4 4 0 0
2022 6.9 4.6 3 3 0
2017 2.1 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · IL · Chicago Heights

793 Ambulance and fire service combined employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 82 employers in Chicago Heights, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fire Department 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lahaina Station 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milford Fire Department - Station 5 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Station 60 - Admin 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Goodmark Nurseries LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2505-Mason City, IL (Monsanto Co.) 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Springfield 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Gas Tech - Engineering 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR 309 CHICAGO 1,341 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHICAGO STMP 1,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6284-YR-309 RX 827 FTE
CITY-NEAR CGT 581 FTE
NAT-TCR Harold White Millworks Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryder 3799 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR B.E.Giovannetti & Sons / Half Moon Fruit & Produce 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR West Coast Contractors 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Urban N. Zink Contractor, Inc. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lamberti USA, Wharton Chemical Complex 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE UBE Machinery, Inc. 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.