Public property management services, government · North Carolina

city of Concord Building and Grounds

Concord, NC · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

city of Concord Building and Grounds runs at 312% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Public property management services, government workplace, earning a grade F.

city of Concord Building and Grounds: 10.0 TCR = 312% of Public property management services, government BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

city of Concord Building and Grounds safety composite

city of Concord Building and Grounds scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

city of Concord Building and Grounds: 0.0 → 14.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 15.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.99× in 2024

city of Concord Building and Grounds's TCR rose 14.8 from 0.0 in 2022 to 14.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Concord, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 312% of ind

  • DART 9.8 DART
  • RANK #95/105
  • PHOTO Utilities
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Utilities (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

city of Concord Building and Grounds in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows city of Concord Building and Grounds averages 10.0 TCR (312% of the Public property management services, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

city of Concord Building and Grounds TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=15.1 · 2024=14.8 · BLS 3.2

Where city of Concord Building and Grounds falls in its industry

1,496 Public property management ser establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #95 safest of 105 Public property management ser employers in North Carolina.

city of Concord Building and Grounds (66 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate city of Concord Building and Grounds
city of Concord Building and Grounds (66 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

city of Concord Building and Grounds has fewer employees than the Public property management services, gov median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.8 9.8 6 3 0
2023 15.1 5.7 6 2 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · NC · Concord

1,496 Public property management services, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 338 employers in Concord, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Utilities 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2962-00002000 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village of Winnetka 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village of Cassopolis 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clinton Field Services 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverbend Steam Station 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salisbury Operations Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASHEVILLE OPERATIONS 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-CHS NorthEast 2,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-Atrium Health Cabarrus 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-TCR Clements Foods Co 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sievers Equipment Company-Hamel 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Motogistics Logistics Inc 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Paducah Ky - 3367 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Region 4- Bend Bldg B 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Region 4- Bend Bldg M 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE API of NH - Manchester 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conveyor Specialties Inc 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.