Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · North Carolina

City of Concord Electric

Concord, NC · ~81 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Concord Electric runs at 428% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Concord Electric: 5.1 TCR = 428% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Concord Electric safety composite

City of Concord Electric scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Concord Electric: 1.2 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2024

City of Concord Electric's TCR rose 8.5 from 1.2 in 2022 to 9.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Concord, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.1 · 428% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #19/20
  • PHOTO Northampton Generati…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Northampton Generating Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

City of Concord Electric in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Concord Electric averages 5.1 TCR (428% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Concord Electric TCR series: 2022=1.2 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=9.7 · BLS 1.2

Where City of Concord Electric falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 20 Electric power generation, fos employers in North Carolina.

City of Concord Electric (81 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Concord Electric
City of Concord Electric (81 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

City of Concord Electric has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.7 5.5 4 3 0
2023 4.5 3.0 3 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NC · Concord

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 338 employers in Concord, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Northampton Generating Company 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eklutna Generation Station 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morris CSC 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brooklyn Navy Yard CoGen Partners 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Battleboro Ag Partnership 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fayetteville Resource Center PNG 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pike Gas Services, LLC South Carolina Statewide Operations 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pike Telecom and Renewables North Carolina Statewide Operations 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-CHS NorthEast 2,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-Atrium Health Cabarrus 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-TCR Food Bank of the Rockies - Western Slope 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona Tile- Denver 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel Roanoke & Conference Center 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Austin Peay Resident Dining 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE South Islander Xpress LLC 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE CSL Red Oak 2018, LLC 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rentex Inc. Las Vegas 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vienna Springs Health Campus 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.