Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid · North Carolina

City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling

Concord, NC · ~56 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling runs at 344% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling: 8.9 TCR = 344% of Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling safety composite

City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2022→2024

City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling injury rate improved

City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling's TCR fell 0.9 from 8.5 in 2022 to 7.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=8.5 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=7.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Concord, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 344% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #78/87
  • PHOTO S03122 - WM of NM - …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S03122 - WM of NM - Santa Fe Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling averages 8.9 TCR (344% of the Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling TCR series: 2022=8.5 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=7.6 · BLS 2.6

Where City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling falls in its industry

2,322 Waste collection services, non establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #78 safest of 87 Waste collection services, non employers in North Carolina.

City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling (56 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling
City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling (56 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

City of Concord Solid Waste & Recycling has more employees than the Waste collection services, nonhazardous median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.6 5.7 3 1 0
2023 10.8 4.3 4 1 0
2022 8.5 8.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · NC · Concord

2,322 Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 338 employers in Concord, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S03122 - WM of NM - Santa Fe Division 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S05840 - Galesburg 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain State Waste - Mount Morris 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Disposal - Macon MO Hauling 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod - Tri-State 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siler City Hatchery 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.B. Rose & Sons, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roanoke Electric Cooperative 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-CHS NorthEast 2,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-Atrium Health Cabarrus 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-TCR 5024 Topeka Rdc 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hastings Ne - 3233 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyards at Lake Granbury 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Deltech Polymers OpCo, LLC 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 36L6 - EAN Holdings, LLC Hawaii Division 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Dublin 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brenntag Pacific - Fresno 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE VPF, Inc 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.