General Public Administration · Minnesota

City of Faribault - Fire Department

Faribault, MN · ~36 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Faribault - Fire Department runs at 339% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General Public Administration workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Faribault - Fire Department: 10.8 TCR = 339% of General Public Administration BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Faribault - Fire Department safety composite

City of Faribault - Fire Department scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−32.5

2017→2020

City of Faribault - Fire Department injury rate improved

City of Faribault - Fire Department's TCR fell 32.5 from 32.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 32.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=32.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Faribault, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.8 · 339% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #222/275
  • PHOTO 600 Parks, Recreatio…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 600 Parks, Recreation & Leisure (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

City of Faribault - Fire Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Faribault - Fire Department averages 10.8 TCR (339% of the General Public Administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Faribault - Fire Department TCR series: 2017=32.5 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Faribault - Fire Department falls in its industry

1,496 General Public Administration establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #222 safest of 275 General Public Administration employers in Minnesota.

City of Faribault - Fire Department (36 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Faribault - Fire Department
City of Faribault - Fire Department (36 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

City of Faribault - Fire Department has fewer employees than the General Public Administration median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 32.5 6.5 1 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · MN · Faribault

1,496 General Public Administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 92 employers in Faribault, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 600 Parks, Recreation & Leisure 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works Transportation Maintenance Repair Division 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Manhattan Beach 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Newport Beach 10.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prairie Moon Nursery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience - Olivia MN R&D 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Counties Cooperative Litchfield 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2011-Stanton, MN (Monsanto Co.) 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faribault Plant 736 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Correctional Facility-Faribault 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daikin Applied South 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faribault Foods LLC 452 FTE
NAT-TCR Boyd Metals of Joplin INC 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Abington of Glenview, LLC 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Strack and Van Til Valparaiso 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR New Market - Store 771 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Office 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northland Plastics Inc 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baillie Lumber Smyrna Sawmill 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.