Electric power distribution systems · Michigan

City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety

Grand Rapids, MI · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety: 1.8 TCR = 148% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety safety composite

City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety: 0.0 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2018

City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety's TCR rose 3.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.8 · 148% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #36/63
  • PHOTO CHUCKATUCK
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CHUCKATUCK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety averages 1.8 TCR (148% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=3.5 · BLS 1.2

Where City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 63 Electric power distribution sy employers in Michigan.

City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety (29 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety
City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety (29 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

City of Grand Rapids-Traffic Safety has fewer employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MI · Grand Rapids

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CHUCKATUCK 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bailey County Electric Cooperative 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parke County Rural Electric Membership Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE City Aluminum Foundry Co. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE premier panel company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Hart 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMich Woldt Dining Hall 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Lankenau Institute for Medical Research (LIMR) 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Roadrunner Carriers, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Panama City Mill 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR East Coast Construction Services, LLC. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE DBCI Houston 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-PD-GPT-GULFPORT-BILOXI-PD 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atrium Post Acute Care of Bloomer 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penske : 5616-00 Oshkosh-DCC/Chambersburg, PA 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.