General services departments, government · Michigan

City of Midland, Michigan

Midland, MI · ~586 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Midland, Michigan runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Midland, Michigan: 6.8 TCR = 212% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Midland, Michigan safety composite

City of Midland, Michigan scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Midland, Michigan: 6.4 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.3× in 2020

City of Midland, Michigan's TCR rose 3.3 from 6.4 in 2016 to 9.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Midland, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 212% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK #32/57
  • PHOTO Clay County - Juveni…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 120 inj
  • SIZE ~586 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clay County - Juvenile Detenion (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

City of Midland, Michigan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Midland, Michigan averages 6.8 TCR (212% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Midland, Michigan TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=7.5 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=9.7 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Midland, Michigan falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 57 General services departments, employers in Michigan.

City of Midland, Michigan (586 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Midland, Michigan
City of Midland, Michigan (586 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

City of Midland, Michigan has more employees than the General services departments, government median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 9.7 8.8 31 3 0
2019 4.7 4.7 19 0 0
2018 5.7 5.2 21 2 0
2017 7.5 6.4 25 4 0
2016 6.4 4.9 24 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · MI · Midland

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 135 employers in Midland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clay County - Juvenile Detenion 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works (5500, 5510, 5530, 5580) 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NN Department of Public Works 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alamance County 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Binson's Medical Equipment and Supplies 585 FTE
STATE-SIZE War Memorial Hospital 585 FTE
STATE-SIZE HIH INC 585 FTE
STATE-SIZE Battle Creek Michigan Mill 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michigan Operations - Midland 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dow Chemical - Great Lakes Bay Region Corporate Facilities 3,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR MyMichigan Medical Center Midland 2,965 FTE
CITY-NEAR MidMichigan Medical Center - Midland 2,348 FTE
NAT-TCR Northwest Management Inc.-ID 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hope Valley Farms Ymca - Ymca of the Triangle 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 529 - Baltimore Branch 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Englewood Community Hospital 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE NuVasive Clinical Services Monitoring Inc - Columbia 586 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houweling's 586 FTE
NAT-SIZE Daimler Trucks North America Corporate Headquarters - Fort Mill, SC 586 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Building 586 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.