Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · Minnesota

City of Minneapolis - Human Resources

Minneapolis, MN · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Minneapolis - Human Resources runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade C.

City of Minneapolis - Human Resources: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Minneapolis - Human Resources safety composite

City of Minneapolis - Human Resources scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

City of Minneapolis - Human Resources held a steady TCR band

City of Minneapolis - Human Resources's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/139
  • PHOTO Pima County Superior…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pima County Superior Court- APO South (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

City of Minneapolis - Human Resources in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Minneapolis - Human Resources averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Minneapolis - Human Resources TCR series: 2018=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Minneapolis - Human Resources falls in its industry

1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 139 Executive offices, federal, st employers in Minnesota.

City of Minneapolis - Human Resources (57 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Minneapolis - Human Resources
City of Minneapolis - Human Resources (57 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

City of Minneapolis - Human Resources has fewer employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · MN · Minneapolis

1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pima County Superior Court- APO South 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Civil Service 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chatt - Development Resource Center 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chatt - General Fund 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCC-Blaine 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Shore Track Services 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aid Electric Corporation 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR CA-Solmetric 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HI-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NY-03 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE VI Manufacturing 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coleman Crisis Services 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE MOR 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Latham Packaged Pools - Bossier City 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.