Handyman construction service, residential building · Minnesota

Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc.

Golden Valley, MN · ~57 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Handyman construction service, residential building workplace, earning a grade F.

Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc.: 8.4 TCR = 221% of Handyman construction service, residential building BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. safety composite

Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2019→2023

Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. injury rate improved

Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.9 from 12.2 in 2019 to 3.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=12.2 · 2020=3.9 · 2022=14.0 · 2023=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Golden Valley, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 221% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #11/24
  • PHOTO Windows of Wisconsin…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Windows of Wisconsin, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. averages 8.4 TCR (221% of the Handyman construction service, residential building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. TCR series: 2019=12.2 · 2020=3.9 · 2022=14 · 2023=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. falls in its industry

698 Handyman construction service, establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 24 Handyman construction service, employers in Minnesota.

Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. (57 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc.
Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. (57 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. has more employees than the Handyman construction service, residenti median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2022 14.0 8.8 8 0 0
2020 3.9 2.0 2 0 0
2019 12.2 4.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · MN · Golden Valley

698 Handyman construction service, residential building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 115 employers in Golden Valley, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Windows of Wisconsin, LLC 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taffera Fine Building & Finishes 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Original Contracting LLC 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stash Construction Inc. 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE TCC-Blaine 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Shore Track Services 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aid Electric Corporation 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE D&D Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Mills (Corporate) 3,932 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koch Companies 1,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR HoneywellMN10 1,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR James Ford Bell R&D Center 1,000 FTE
NAT-TCR McDonough, GA (Mazda) 113 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Amarillo Southwest, Tx #03087 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FL Int'l Univ PG5 CFA 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Market-Tacoma WA 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Signify 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Embassy Suites Tampa Airport/Westshore 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mack Studios 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carbon Polymers Co. 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.