Public property management services, government · North Carolina

City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications

Raleigh, NC · ~92 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Public property management services, government workplace, earning a grade A.

City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Public property management services, government BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications safety composite

City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications: 0.0 → 0.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications's TCR rose 0.9 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Raleigh, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/105
  • PHOTO Public Health & Huma…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Public Health & Human Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Public property management services, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=1 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications falls in its industry

1,496 Public property management ser establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 105 Public property management ser employers in North Carolina.

City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications (92 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications
City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications (92 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

City of Raleigh- Emergency Communications has fewer employees than the Public property management services, gov median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · NC · Raleigh

1,496 Public property management services, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Public Health & Human Services 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palmdale 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Human Resources 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of East Windsor - Parks and Recreation 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aqua North Carolina, Inc. - Cary 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Balfour Beatty - Havelock Bypass 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Conover 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eldeco Inc Charlotte 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Performance Contractors, Inc. - Cameron LNG-Hackberry 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Midland Illinois 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Administration 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Norwich Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Christian Community Home of Osceola 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynamic Marketing, Inc. 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Optimal Delivery @ Altitude LLC 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jenkins Landscape Company 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.