City and town managers' offices · North Carolina

City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services

Raleigh, NC · ~163 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services runs at 388% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical City and town managers' offices workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services: 12.4 TCR = 388% of City and town managers' offices BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services safety composite

City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services: 11.5 → 12.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 13.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2024

City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services's TCR rose 0.6 from 11.5 in 2022 to 12.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Raleigh, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 388% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #46/47
  • PHOTO City of Placentia
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Placentia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services averages 12.4 TCR (388% of the City and town managers' offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services TCR series: 2022=11.5 · 2023=13.6 · 2024=12.2 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services falls in its industry

1,010 City and town managers' office establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 47 City and town managers' office employers in North Carolina.

City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services (163 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services
City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services (163 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services has more employees than the City and town managers' offices median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.2 8.3 19 0 0
2023 13.6 4.8 20 0 0
2022 11.5 9.4 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · NC · Raleigh

1,010 City and town managers' offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Placentia 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Canton 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR COH Police Department West Patrol 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Elgin 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Milliken & Company Two Rivers Plant 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Dot Readi Mix LLC 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - MAIDEN 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0583 MANHEIM NORTH CAROLINA 318 BAGLEY RD 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Dynamic Homes 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Littleton 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR HW Downtown Brooklyn 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bob Woodall Commercial Air Care Systems, Inc. 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saputo Cheese Newman 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE EMD Performance Materials Branchburg NJ 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE MM Packaging PR - Guaynabo 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roman Electric Co., Inc. 163 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.