Houses, prefabricated, wood (except mobile homes), manufacturing · Minnesota

Dynamic Homes

Detroit Lakes, MN · ~98 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dynamic Homes runs at 376% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Houses, prefabricated, wood (except mobile homes), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Dynamic Homes: 12.4 TCR = 376% of Houses, prefabricated, wood (except mobile homes), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dynamic Homes safety composite

Dynamic Homes scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dynamic Homes: 8.3 → 23.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 23.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2024

Dynamic Homes's TCR rose 15.6 from 8.3 in 2016 to 23.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321992 · Detroit Lakes, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 376% of ind

  • DART 10.8 DART
  • RANK #7/9
  • PHOTO Precision Building S…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Precision Building Systems-Denver (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Dynamic Homes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dynamic Homes averages 12.4 TCR (376% of the Houses, prefabricated, wood (except mobile homes), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dynamic Homes TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=17.6 · 2018=5.2 · 2022=8.4 · 2023=11.2 · 2024=23.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Dynamic Homes falls in its industry

177 Houses, prefabricated, wood (e establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Houses, prefabricated, wood (e employers in Minnesota.

Dynamic Homes (98 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 7.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Dynamic Homes
Dynamic Homes (98 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 7.7

Dynamic Homes has more employees than the Houses, prefabricated, wood (except mobi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 23.9 10.8 20 0 0
2023 11.2 7.4 9 0 0
2022 8.4 5.3 8 0 0
2018 5.2 2.6 4 0 0
2017 17.6 6.6 16 0 0
2016 8.3 4.1 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321992 · MN · Detroit Lakes

177 Houses, prefabricated, wood (except mobile homes), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 86 employers in Detroit Lakes, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Precision Building Systems-Denver 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tuff Shed Store 590 - Birmingham - SE 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Structural Modulars, Inc. 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jamaica Cottage Shop Inc. 12.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Revol Greens MN, LLC 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greystone Construction 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Restoration Corporaion - Minneapolis 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Tex Electric, Inc. 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Mary's Hospital Detroit Lakes 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Marys Hospital - Detroit Lakes 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Operations - Detroit Lakes, MN 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR BTD Manufacturing Detroit Lakes 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Littleton 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Raleigh- Solid Waste Services 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR HW Downtown Brooklyn 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bob Woodall Commercial Air Care Systems, Inc. 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carson Industries, Inc. 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inspector Drain, Inc 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Track 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mill Brothers Landscape & Nursery Inc. 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.