General services departments, government · Minnesota

City of Richfield - Public Works Facility

Richfield, MN · ~51 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Richfield - Public Works Facility runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Richfield - Public Works Facility: 4.5 TCR = 142% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Richfield - Public Works Facility safety composite

City of Richfield - Public Works Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Richfield - Public Works Facility: 1.8 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2021

City of Richfield - Public Works Facility's TCR rose 3.2 from 1.8 in 2019 to 5.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Richfield, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 142% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #130/275
  • PHOTO City of Waterville
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Waterville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

City of Richfield - Public Works Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Richfield - Public Works Facility averages 4.5 TCR (142% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Richfield - Public Works Facility TCR series: 2019=1.8 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=5 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Richfield - Public Works Facility falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #130 safest of 275 General services departments, employers in Minnesota.

City of Richfield - Public Works Facility (51 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Richfield - Public Works Facility
City of Richfield - Public Works Facility (51 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

City of Richfield - Public Works Facility has fewer employees than the General services departments, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2020 6.8 5.1 2 2 0
2019 1.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · MN · Richfield

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 80 employers in Richfield, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Waterville 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Mint Hill-Public Works 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Leland: Town Hall 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00002000 2000 - GENERAL SERVICES DIVISION 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Union Dairy LLP 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE ON 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wes Hanson Builders 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis Office 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR 900010 6,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2300 - Richfield 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Richfield Best Buy Office Bldg 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1828 RICHFIELD 7601 PENN AVE BLDG 501 FTE
NAT-TCR Sss Plantation Opco LLC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Telluride Express 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas, Texas 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cambro NCF 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE MBK - Seven Lakes 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Women's Health at Women's Hospital 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairlane Dialysis 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Envoy of Lawrenceville 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.