Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Fairway Pines Senior Living

Sauk Centre, MN · ~51 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
30.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairway Pines Senior Living runs at 800% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Fairway Pines Senior Living: 30.4 TCR = 800% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairway Pines Senior Living safety composite

Fairway Pines Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 30.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 41.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fairway Pines Senior Living: 23.9 → 45.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 45.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.37× in 2023

Fairway Pines Senior Living's TCR rose 21.7 from 23.9 in 2018 to 45.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sauk Centre, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 30.4 · 800% of ind

  • DART 41.8 DART
  • RANK #240/240
  • PHOTO Carlton Senior Livin…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carlton Senior Living Davis (0.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Fairway Pines Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairway Pines Senior Living averages 30.4 TCR (800% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Fairway Pines Senior Living TCR series: 2018=23.9 · 2019=4 · 2020=43.5 · 2021=35.1 · 2023=45.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Fairway Pines Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #240 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Fairway Pines Senior Living (51 employees, TCR 30.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairway Pines Senior Living
Fairway Pines Senior Living (51 employees, TCR 30.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Fairway Pines Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 45.6 41.8 0 12 0
2021 35.1 35.1 1 8 0
2020 43.5 32.6 4 8 0
2019 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2018 23.9 4.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Sauk Centre

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 23 employers in Sauk Centre, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carlton Senior Living Davis 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Residence of Fosston 29.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chandler Place Independent Living 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE QualiTech - D6 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wes Hanson Builders 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute Stillwater 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE LA-MNTC-LAKESIDE ACADEMY 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4253 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare - Sauk Centre 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4253 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sauk Centre Public Schools 233 FTE
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Danvers, MA 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cortron, Inc. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE 100810 NAPA Carlisle Distribution Center 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madill Pettijohn Plant 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.