Public property management services, government · Minnesota

City of Rosemount Public Works

Rosemount, MN · ~37 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Rosemount Public Works runs at 622% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Public property management services, government workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Rosemount Public Works: 17.4 TCR = 622% of Public property management services, government BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Rosemount Public Works safety composite

City of Rosemount Public Works scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2017→2021

City of Rosemount Public Works injury rate improved

City of Rosemount Public Works's TCR fell 6.3 from 14.7 in 2017 to 8.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 28.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.7 · 2018=28.3 · 2019=26.7 · 2020=9.1 · 2021=8.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Rosemount, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.4 · 622% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #14/14
  • PHOTO HDD INC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HDD INC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

City of Rosemount Public Works in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Rosemount Public Works averages 17.4 TCR (622% of the Public property management services, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Rosemount Public Works TCR series: 2017=14.7 · 2018=28.3 · 2019=26.7 · 2020=9.1 · 2021=8.4 · BLS 2.8

Where City of Rosemount Public Works falls in its industry

932 Public property management ser establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 14 Public property management ser employers in Minnesota.

City of Rosemount Public Works (37 employees, TCR 17.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Rosemount Public Works
City of Rosemount Public Works (37 employees, TCR 17.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

City of Rosemount Public Works has fewer employees than the Public property management services, gov median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.4 4.2 2 0 0
2020 9.1 9.1 2 0 0
2019 26.7 13.3 6 0 0
2018 28.3 14.1 6 0 0
2017 14.7 14.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · MN · Rosemount

932 Public property management services, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 60 employers in Rosemount, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HDD INC 17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR RJ Gorman Marine Construction 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stokes Marine, Inc 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Bay Regional Park Districtd 16.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Betaseed Inc - Shakopee 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pals 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supply Support 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Independent School District 196 4,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources 1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, LLC 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD 917 Rosemount 559 FTE
NAT-TCR Select Metal Litho Greenville 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ARBCO Industries, LLC 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DC4 Carteret 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Franciscan Villa 17.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Winsupply Jacksonville DC LLC 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04162 - Irvine Transfer Station and MRF 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bastian Mobile Robotics 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE VAFOAM 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.