Park and recreational open space improvement construction · California
East Bay Regional Park Districtd
Oakland, CA · ~870 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 16.5
- Avg TCR
- 2.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
East Bay Regional Park Districtd runs at 589% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Park and recreational open space improvement construction workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 16.5
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 182
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares East Bay Regional Park Districtd's OSHA Total Case Rate of 16.5 to the Park and recreational open space improvement construction BLS benchmark of 2.8 (589% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
East Bay Regional Park Districtd's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.8 industry benchmark.
Where East Bay Regional Park Districtd falls in its industry
1,364 Park and recreational open spa establishmentsSafer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #121 safest of 122 Park and recreational open spa employers in California.
Trend analysis for East Bay Regional Park Districtd
Between 2017 and 2018, East Bay Regional Park Districtd's Total Case Rate improved from 18.8 to 14.1 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 25% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 14.1, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 18.8, a spread of 4.7 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, East Bay Regional Park Districtd recorded 182 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 182 injuries, 39 illnesses shown on this page for East Bay Regional Park Districtd are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 237990 - Park and recreational open space improvement construction.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
55 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 1,371,919 hours worked = 8.02 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| East Bay Regional Park Districtd (this establishment) | 16.48 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Earth retention system construction industry avg | 2.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 237990 |
| California state avg (all industries) | 5.64 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by East Bay Regional Park Districtd to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2018: 97 reportable incidents · 79 injuries, 18 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 124 reportable incidents · 103 injuries, 21 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 14.1 | 8.0 | 79 | 18 | 0 |
| 2017 | 18.8 | 12.4 | 103 | 21 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on East Bay Regional Park Districtd's reported OSHA injury record versus its Park and recreational open space improvement construction peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 589% of the Park and recreational open space improvement construction benchmark, East Bay Regional Park Districtd reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Park and recreational open space improvement construction sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is East Bay Regional Park Districtd's safety grade?
How many injuries has East Bay Regional Park Districtd reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within California, and by nearby establishments in Oakland - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~16.5)
Similar size (~870 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.