Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway · Michigan

City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics

Roseville, MI · ~23 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics runs at 335% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics: 9.4 TCR = 335% of Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics safety composite

City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2018→2024

City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics injury rate improved

City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics's TCR fell 6.7 from 16.7 in 2018 to 10.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=16.7 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=12.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=10.0 · 2024=10.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Roseville, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 335% of ind

  • DART 10.0 DART
  • RANK #108/139
  • PHOTO ELK RUN
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ELK RUN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics averages 9.4 TCR (335% of the Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics TCR series: 2018=16.7 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=12.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=10 · 2024=10 · BLS 2.8

Where City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics falls in its industry

4,078 Repair, highway, road, street, establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 139 Repair, highway, road, street, employers in Michigan.

City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics (23 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics
City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics (23 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

City of Roseville DPW/Mechanics has fewer employees than the Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.0 10.0 2 0 0
2023 10.0 10.0 2 0 0
2022 8.5 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 12.4 0.0 3 0 0
2019 8.1 4.0 2 0 0
2018 16.7 16.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · MI · Roseville

4,078 Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 82 employers in Roseville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ELK RUN 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR HP Civil Inc. 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverview Paving, Inc. 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferraiolo 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms - MIS 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Casey Woodwyk, Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Schuring, Jr. Company 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atwood Timber and Lumber 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4003 - TPG/PBM 666 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4002 - TPG/PBS (inc 4009) 565 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2959 446 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCO Engineering, Inc. 417 FTE
NAT-TCR Schneider Equipment, Inc. (dba Schneider Water Services) 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Holland Mfg. Co 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1880 Lkq 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Madras Thrift Store 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Forward Technologies, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE IHG Army Hotels - Fort Buchanan (Holiday Inn Express/Army Lodging) 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dickerson Mechanical, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northside #068 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.