Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing · Michigan

RCO Engineering, Inc.

Roseville, MI · ~417 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RCO Engineering, Inc. runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

RCO Engineering, Inc.: 4.3 TCR = 80% of Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RCO Engineering, Inc. safety composite

RCO Engineering, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

RCO Engineering, Inc.: 1.6 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.3× in 2024

RCO Engineering, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.4 from 1.6 in 2016 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336360 · Roseville, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.3 · 80% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #73/100
  • PHOTO NA-US-CA-Fremont-901…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 150 inj
  • SIZE ~417 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NA-US-CA-Fremont-901 Page (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

RCO Engineering, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RCO Engineering, Inc. averages 4.3 TCR (80% of the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RCO Engineering, Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=5 · BLS 5.4

Where RCO Engineering, Inc. falls in its industry

384 Motor vehicle interior systems establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 100 Motor vehicle interior systems employers in Michigan.

RCO Engineering, Inc. (417 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate RCO Engineering, Inc.
RCO Engineering, Inc. (417 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3

RCO Engineering, Inc. has more employees than the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., he median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 1.3 23 0 0
2023 4.5 1.5 23 1 0
2022 4.9 2.1 20 1 0
2021 3.8 1.1 14 0 0
2020 3.5 1.9 13 2 0
2019 6.8 2.1 31 2 0
2018 4.5 1.1 19 1 0
2016 1.6 0.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336360 · MI · Roseville

384 Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 82 employers in Roseville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NA-US-CA-Fremont-901 Page 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seats Incorporated Spring Hill Kansas 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inteva Products Cottondale Operations 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR IAC, Iowa City LLC 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 050 - Cascade 417 FTE
STATE-SIZE 11027 417 FTE
STATE-SIZE 651 VHS UNIVERSITY LABORATORIES 417 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mead Johnson Nutrition 418 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4003 - TPG/PBM 666 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4002 - TPG/PBS (inc 4009) 565 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2959 446 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2959 401 FTE
NAT-TCR Western Construction, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TMI Systems Corporation 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Siegel Gas - Medley, FL 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Martindale Electric Co. 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Silicones : Sistersville, West Virginia 417 FTE
NAT-SIZE X34 Med - Wilsonville 417 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gas & Electric Building 417 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leisure Services & Human Services 417 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.