County supervisors' and executives' offices · Arizona

Yuma County Administration

Yuma, AZ · ~31 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yuma County Administration runs at 208% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical County supervisors' and executives' offices workplace, earning a grade F.

Yuma County Administration: 6.7 TCR = 208% of County supervisors' and executives' offices BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yuma County Administration safety composite

Yuma County Administration scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Yuma County Administration held a steady TCR band

Yuma County Administration's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.6 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 31.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=31.6 · 2023=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Yuma, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 208% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/39
  • PHOTO Village of Shiloh
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Village of Shiloh (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Yuma County Administration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yuma County Administration averages 6.7 TCR (208% of the County supervisors' and executives' offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Yuma County Administration TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=31.6 · 2023=3.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Yuma County Administration falls in its industry

1,010 County supervisors' and execut establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 39 County supervisors' and execut employers in Arizona.

Yuma County Administration (31 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Yuma County Administration
Yuma County Administration (31 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Yuma County Administration has fewer employees than the County supervisors' and executives' offi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 31.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 7.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · AZ · Yuma

1,010 County supervisors' and executives' offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 274 employers in Yuma, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Village of Shiloh 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beltrami County - County Administration Building 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Municipio Las Marias (Servicio a la Comunidad) 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Scottsdale 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4769-6250-OUTLETS 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steel Fabrication and Erection 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE TMTPHX LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbert Store 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primetime Harvesting Inc 2,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing- Arizona 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Regional Medical Center 1,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR PGM PACKING INC 1,423 FTE
NAT-TCR American Whirlpool Clifton 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kwik Fill M299/299 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Elite Roofing Supply-NM, LLC 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 55443 Chicago PACE 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cif (Jble) 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE JM Huber Marblehead IL 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reflections Retirement Community 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Divine House Inc. - Southern (Granite, Redwood, Marshall) 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.