Executive and legislative office combinations · North Carolina

City of Wilson

Wilson, NC · ~1,080 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Wilson runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Executive and legislative office combinations workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Wilson: 6.1 TCR = 190% of Executive and legislative office combinations BLS 3.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Wilson safety composite

City of Wilson scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2024

City of Wilson injury rate improved

City of Wilson's TCR fell 1.9 from 6.9 in 2016 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.9 · 2017=9.2 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921140 · Wilson, NC ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 190% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #23/34
  • PHOTO Fentress County Mayor
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 405 inj
  • SIZE ~1,080 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fentress County Mayor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

City of Wilson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Wilson averages 6.1 TCR (190% of the Executive and legislative office combinations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Wilson TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2017=9.2 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=6 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=5 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Wilson falls in its industry

239 Executive and legislative offi establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 34 Executive and legislative offi employers in North Carolina.

City of Wilson (1,080 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Wilson
City of Wilson (1,080 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8

City of Wilson has more employees than the Executive and legislative office combina median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 1.7 38 0 0
2023 4.9 2.1 36 1 0
2022 2.9 1.3 21 1 0
2021 5.3 2.7 40 0 0
2020 6.0 3.4 46 1 0
2019 6.9 4.2 51 3 0
2018 7.7 4.9 56 5 0
2017 9.2 6.5 69 3 0
2016 6.9 4.0 48 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921140 · NC · Wilson

239 Executive and legislative office combinations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 148 employers in Wilson, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fentress County Mayor 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charter County of Wayne Michigan 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar County 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GENERAL SERVICES 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Processing 1,080 FTE
STATE-SIZE Watauga Medical Center, Inc. 1,077 FTE
STATE-SIZE FSC II, LLC dba Fred Smith Company- Central Division 1,084 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - CLT3 1,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wilson (BAMG) 1,797 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kidde Aerospace & Defense 1,064 FTE
CITY-NEAR DLP Wilson Medical Center 907 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smithfield 618 FTE
NAT-TCR 37031-Philadelphia 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tntci - Nashville Trailer Shop 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Waimp - Washington Import 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Market of Choice #11 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus 1,080 FTE
NAT-SIZE UCB Smyrna 1,080 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sebastopol Processing 1,080 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2904-ASM-OH 1,080 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.