Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing · Florida

L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus

Melbourne, FL · ~1,080 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus runs at 3% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus: 0.1 TCR = 3% of Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus safety composite

L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus held a steady TCR band

L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.1 in 2022 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.1 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Melbourne, FL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 3% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/38
  • PHOTO AHQ
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~1,080 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AHQ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus averages 0.1 TCR (3% of the Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus TCR series: 2022=0.1 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 3.3

Where L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus falls in its industry

388 Acceleration indicators and sy establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 38 Acceleration indicators and sy employers in Florida.

L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus (1,080 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus
L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus (1,080 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

L3Harris Technologies INC NASA Campus has more employees than the Acceleration indicators and systems comp median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2022 0.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · FL · Melbourne

388 Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AHQ 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HMAPFB2 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAE Systems Electronic Systems CIA03 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HMAPFB4 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Orlando World Center Marriott 1,081 FTE
STATE-SIZE 116812-ROYAL PALM FL P&DC 1,078 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Columbia Co., Inc. 1,084 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brandon Regional Hospital 1,085 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR Novelis Inc. 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Redhorse Corporation 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Moscone Center 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mountain America Exposition Center 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Wilson 1,080 FTE
NAT-SIZE UCB Smyrna 1,080 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sebastopol Processing 1,080 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2904-ASM-OH 1,080 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.