Social service advocacy organizations · Alabama

Civilian Marksmanship Program South

Anniston, AL · ~134 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Civilian Marksmanship Program South runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Social service advocacy organizations workplace, earning a grade C.

Civilian Marksmanship Program South: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Social service advocacy organizations BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Civilian Marksmanship Program South safety composite

Civilian Marksmanship Program South scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Civilian Marksmanship Program South held a steady TCR band

Civilian Marksmanship Program South's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813319 · Anniston, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P100
  • PHOTO The Marsh
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Marsh (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Civilian Marksmanship Program South in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Civilian Marksmanship Program South averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Social service advocacy organizations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Civilian Marksmanship Program South TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Civilian Marksmanship Program South falls in its industry

81 Social service advocacy organi establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Civilian Marksmanship Program South (134 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 147 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Civilian Marksmanship Program South
Civilian Marksmanship Program South (134 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 147 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Civilian Marksmanship Program South has fewer employees than the Social service advocacy organizations median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813319 · AL · Anniston

81 Social service advocacy organizations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 101 employers in Anniston, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Marsh 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camp Menogyn 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anaheim Independencia Family Resource Center 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR YMCA in Woodbury 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woerner Farms LLC 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Parallel Forest Products 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mobile Paperboard 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Montgomery AL Kershaw 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Union 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Union Anniston 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Automotive Components 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Automotive Components Anniston 344 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tecan Systems 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Galt Elm BMD, Inc. 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Univ Miss Med Ctr Jackson 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Safc, Inc 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.