Commercial building construction general contractors · Florida

Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL

Orlando, FL · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL: 4.6 TCR = 159% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL safety composite

Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2017

Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL injury rate improved

Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL's TCR fell 2.0 from 5.6 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.6 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.6 · 2017=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Orlando, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 159% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #189/218
  • PHOTO 1069 - BELFOR Long I…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1069 - BELFOR Long Island NY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL averages 4.6 TCR (159% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL TCR series: 2016=5.6 · 2017=3.6 · BLS 2.9

Where Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #189 safest of 218 Commercial building constructi employers in Florida.

Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL (50 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL
Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL (50 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Clancy & Theys Construction Company - Orlando, FL has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.6 0.0 2 0 0
2016 5.6 3.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · FL · Orlando

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1069 - BELFOR Long Island NY 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICS Construction Services, Ltd 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Javen Construction 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR P2 Contracting, LLC 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushnell 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine foods Lake City 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M & M Packing LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walton Service Center 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR N and R of Monticello Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pandrol 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AR-West Memphis-Operating Center 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Plainfield - Ford 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Camdenton Inc 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of California Inc 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE 06- Knoxville, TN 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Muddy Creek 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.