Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · New York

Javen Construction

Penfield, NY · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Javen Construction runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

Javen Construction: 4.6 TCR = 159% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Javen Construction safety composite

Javen Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Javen Construction held a steady TCR band

Javen Construction's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=12.7 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Penfield, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 159% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #174/218
  • PHOTO 1069 - BELFOR Long I…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1069 - BELFOR Long Island NY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Javen Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Javen Construction averages 4.6 TCR (159% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Javen Construction TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=12.7 · 2021=5 · 2022=3 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Javen Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #174 safest of 218 Addition, alteration and renov employers in New York.

Javen Construction (34 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Javen Construction
Javen Construction (34 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Javen Construction has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2022 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2020 12.7 5.1 4 1 0
2019 5.9 5.9 2 0 0
2018 7.8 7.8 2 0 0
2017 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NY · Penfield

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 19 employers in Penfield, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1069 - BELFOR Long Island NY 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICS Construction Services, Ltd 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR P2 Contracting, LLC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Redwood Bay Biotech 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reeves Farms LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenview Dairy LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashland Farm LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Porterdale Farms Inc. 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Penfield 063 599 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastside Family YMCA 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR Before and After School Division 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penfield 171 FTE
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 059 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MG Ambulatory Care Center 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bowtech,LLC 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Orpon - Swan Island Center 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tulsa Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waco 10084 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dedicated Idaho 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson 10156 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.