Telecommunications carriers, wired · Puerto Rico

CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo

Fajardo, PR · ~23 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo runs at 1336% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications carriers, wired workplace, earning a grade F.

CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo: 9.3 TCR = 1336% of Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS 0.7 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo safety composite

CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−34.4

2016→2024

CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo injury rate improved

CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo's TCR fell 34.4 from 34.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 34.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=34.4 · 2017=26.1 · 2018=23.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Fajardo, PR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 1336% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #65/71
  • PHOTO WeLink INC Vegas
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WeLink INC Vegas (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Puerto Rico employers → · Look up another →

CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo averages 9.3 TCR (1336% of the Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo TCR series: 2016=34.4 · 2017=26.1 · 2018=23.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo falls in its industry

537 Telecommunications carriers, w establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Puerto Rico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 71 Telecommunications carriers, w employers in Puerto Rico.

CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo (23 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo
CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo (23 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

CLARO / PRT - CAC Fajardo has fewer employees than the Telecommunications carriers, wired median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 23.6 23.6 1 4 0
2017 26.1 19.6 0 4 0
2016 34.4 34.4 0 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · PR · Fajardo

537 Telecommunications carriers, wired employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,632 rated employers in Puerto Rico with headcount on file · 26 employers in Fajardo, PR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WeLink INC Vegas 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prior Lake Nuvera 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Oficina Central Ponce 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardonville Cooperative Telephone Association 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 27-EXT. SABALOS GARDEN 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oficinas Centrales-Division 16 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siembra Finca Caracolillo LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE ConsPro Corp. 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Life Sciences : Pall - Fajardo 690 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1822 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1822 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital HIMA San Pablo Fajardo 279 FTE
NAT-TCR Northern Lights, Inc. Sagle, Idaho 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Whaley Foodservice-Atlanta 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Department H200 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bulverde Road 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hatchery 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE RET-SNP Store 25 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE RET-SNW Store 10 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE RET-SPE Store 18 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.