Telecommunications carriers, wired · Puerto Rico

CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama

Guayama, PR · ~22 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama runs at 353% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications carriers, wired workplace, earning a grade F.

CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama: 2.5 TCR = 353% of Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS 0.7 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama safety composite

CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2016→2024

CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama injury rate improved

CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama's TCR fell 7.1 from 7.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Guayama, PR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 353% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/71
  • PHOTO Rochester Telephone …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rochester Telephone Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Puerto Rico employers → · Look up another →

CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama averages 2.5 TCR (353% of the Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama falls in its industry

537 Telecommunications carriers, w establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Puerto Rico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 71 Telecommunications carriers, w employers in Puerto Rico.

CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama (22 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama
CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama (22 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

CLARO / PRT - CAC Plaza Guayama has fewer employees than the Telecommunications carriers, wired median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.7 0.0 0 2 0
2020 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.2 0.0 0 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · PR · Guayama

537 Telecommunications carriers, wired employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,632 rated employers in Puerto Rico with headcount on file · 23 employers in Guayama, PR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rochester Telephone Company 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Plains Communications 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1101 Stewart Ave 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Penuelas CO 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE LUMA, Caguas Customer Experience 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE PROYECTO YATES-BIRD, LLC - STEP 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE 18-LA MESETA 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE 37-SAN FERNANDO 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR PF Consumer Healthcare B.V.(Puerto Rico Operations) LLC 879 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pfizer Consumer Healthcare 657 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2072 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2072 332 FTE
NAT-TCR Asbury Facility 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Territo Electric, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kendall Construction, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR KFC-Kahului #020 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE A-tech PA 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kauai 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vs - Il 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tiff`s Treats - H5 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.