Telecommunications carriers, wired · Puerto Rico

CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35

San Juan, PR · ~36 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35 runs at 429% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications carriers, wired workplace, earning a grade F.

CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35: 3.0 TCR = 429% of Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS 0.7 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35 safety composite

CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2024

CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35 injury rate improved

CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35's TCR fell 3.7 from 3.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=11.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · San Juan, PR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.0 · 429% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/71
  • PHOTO Ellijay Telephone
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ellijay Telephone (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Puerto Rico employers → · Look up another →

CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35 averages 3.0 TCR (429% of the Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35 TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=11.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35 falls in its industry

537 Telecommunications carriers, w establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Puerto Rico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 71 Telecommunications carriers, w employers in Puerto Rico.

CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35 (36 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35
CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35 (36 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

CLARO / PRT - Hato Rey Parada 35 has fewer employees than the Telecommunications carriers, wired median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2021 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.3 11.3 1 2 0
2016 3.7 3.7 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · PR · San Juan

537 Telecommunications carriers, wired employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,632 rated employers in Puerto Rico with headcount on file · 262 employers in San Juan, PR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ellijay Telephone 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Point Broadband Fiber Holding, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Segra Home Quarters 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Region Mutual Telephone Coop 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE GENERA CAMBALACHE 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE LUMA, Fajardo Fleet, Operations and Warehouse 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE LUMA, Canovanas Fleet Operations and Warehouse 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Villavicencio & Associates 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Policia de Puerto Rico 13,672 FTE
CITY-NEAR Autoridad de Energia Electrica 5,784 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tribunal de Justicia 5,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados de Puerto Rico 4,195 FTE
NAT-TCR T2 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Goshen 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas QCC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fashion Place #557 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bosch Rexroth Corporation 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE LectraHeat, LTD 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nebraska P.E.O. Home 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tex-Mix Hutto 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.