Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, long-distance (TL) · Ohio

Classic Carriers

Versailles, OH · ~81 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Classic Carriers runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, long-distance (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Classic Carriers: 1.3 TCR = 29% of Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, long-distance (TL) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Classic Carriers safety composite

Classic Carriers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2023

Classic Carriers injury rate improved

Classic Carriers's TCR fell 2.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.1 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Versailles, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 29% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #28/186
  • PHOTO Simon's Trucking Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Simon's Trucking Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Classic Carriers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Classic Carriers averages 1.3 TCR (29% of the Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, long-distance (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Classic Carriers TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.1 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=1 · BLS 4.5

Where Classic Carriers falls in its industry

3,252 Bulk mail truck transportation establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 186 Bulk mail truck transportation employers in Ohio.

Classic Carriers (81 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Classic Carriers
Classic Carriers (81 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Classic Carriers has more employees than the Bulk mail truck transportation, contract median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2019 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2016 3.4 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · OH · Versailles

3,252 Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, long-distance (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 13 employers in Versailles, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Simon's Trucking Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Haven, CT - Industry Drive Extension 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seymour, IN - E. 4th Street 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE A-1 Egg Farm 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ohio's Electric Cooperatives 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zanesville Service Center 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Combs Interior Specialties, Inc. 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midmark - Versailles 1,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midmark Corporation 924 FTE
CITY-NEAR King's Command Foods, LLC - Versailles, Ohio 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Weaver Bros. Inc. Main Plant 126 FTE
NAT-TCR Escalon Premier Brands 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairfield MLS 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR RTI-Martinsville 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2721 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE OrthAlign, Inc. 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tippins 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCoys Building Supply-New Braunfels Millwork 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pfizer Global Supply (Antibody Drug Conjugate Manufacturing) 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.