Commercial refrigeration system installation · California

CLC Los Angeles/Orange County

Anaheim, CA · ~48 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CLC Los Angeles/Orange County runs at 291% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial refrigeration system installation workplace, earning a grade F.

CLC Los Angeles/Orange County: 8.2 TCR = 291% of Commercial refrigeration system installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CLC Los Angeles/Orange County safety composite

CLC Los Angeles/Orange County scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CLC Los Angeles/Orange County: 7.5 → 8.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2023

CLC Los Angeles/Orange County's TCR rose 1.3 from 7.5 in 2022 to 8.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Anaheim, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 291% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #456/594
  • PHOTO Almar Plumbing & Hea…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Almar Plumbing & Heating Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CLC Los Angeles/Orange County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CLC Los Angeles/Orange County averages 8.2 TCR (291% of the Commercial refrigeration system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CLC Los Angeles/Orange County TCR series: 2022=7.5 · 2023=8.8 · BLS 2.8

Where CLC Los Angeles/Orange County falls in its industry

5,793 Commercial refrigeration syste establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #456 safest of 594 Commercial refrigeration syste employers in California.

CLC Los Angeles/Orange County (48 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CLC Los Angeles/Orange County
CLC Los Angeles/Orange County (48 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

CLC Los Angeles/Orange County has fewer employees than the Commercial refrigeration system installa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.8 7.3 6 0 0
2022 7.5 7.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · Anaheim

5,793 Commercial refrigeration system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Almar Plumbing & Heating Corp 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RotoCo - Vista 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR S.A. Comunale - Carolina 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neuworks Mechanical Inc 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE ARVIN PRODUCTION & ADMIN 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rava Business Park 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guerrero Transportation & Contracting Inc 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE VPS, Inc 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR Smoky Hills Genetics, LLC. 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sequin Lumber Company-Bay City 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Uniflight 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fargo 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE AGE Cleburne Plant 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martin J. Concrete, Inc 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE KB Concrete Systems, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aguadilla 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.