Plastics resins compounding from recycled materials · North Carolina

Clear Path Recycling

Fayetteville, NC · ~79 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clear Path Recycling runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Plastics resins compounding from recycled materials workplace, earning a grade B.

Clear Path Recycling: 1.9 TCR = 57% of Plastics resins compounding from recycled materials BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clear Path Recycling safety composite

Clear Path Recycling scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2018→2024

Clear Path Recycling injury rate improved

Clear Path Recycling's TCR fell 2.3 from 4.5 in 2018 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.5 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325991 · Fayetteville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 57% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #10/22
  • PHOTO Ampacet Research & D…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ampacet Research & Development Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Clear Path Recycling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clear Path Recycling averages 1.9 TCR (57% of the Plastics resins compounding from recycled materials BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clear Path Recycling TCR series: 2018=4.5 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Clear Path Recycling falls in its industry

342 Plastics resins compounding fr establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 22 Plastics resins compounding fr employers in North Carolina.

Clear Path Recycling (79 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Clear Path Recycling
Clear Path Recycling (79 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Clear Path Recycling has more employees than the Plastics resins compounding from recycle median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2023 3.2 3.2 3 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 1.1 2 0 0
2018 4.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325991 · NC · Fayetteville

342 Plastics resins compounding from recycled materials employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 317 employers in Fayetteville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ampacet Research & Development Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primex Plastics Color & Compounding Garfield 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Asahi Kasei Plastics- Fowlerville 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ampacet Ohio, Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience Laurinburg 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE GASTONIA OPS MOC GARAGE BLDG B 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sikes Place - Ste 100 / 200 / 250 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inside Sales Raleigh 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Fear Valley Health System/Cumberland County 5,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company - Fayetteville 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Cumberland 2,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Fayetteville 2,044 FTE
NAT-TCR Land-Grant Brewing Company, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard Chicago Deerfield 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bellmore Home Center Inc Overhead 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Augusta 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookhaven 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homeland,FL - 208 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bainbridge Health and Rehab 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boyd Linen Uniform Service 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.