Finfish production, farm raising · Idaho

Clear Springs Foods Research and Development

Buhl, ID · ~28 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clear Springs Foods Research and Development runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Finfish production, farm raising workplace, earning a grade B.

Clear Springs Foods Research and Development: 3.0 TCR = 66% of Finfish production, farm raising BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clear Springs Foods Research and Development safety composite

Clear Springs Foods Research and Development scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Clear Springs Foods Research and Development: 3.4 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2.85× in 2019

Clear Springs Foods Research and Development's TCR rose 5.0 from 3.4 in 2016 to 8.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112511 · Buhl, ID AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 66% of ind

  • DART 8.4 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Box Canyon Farm
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Box Canyon Farm (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Clear Springs Foods Research and Development in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clear Springs Foods Research and Development averages 3.0 TCR (66% of the Finfish production, farm raising BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clear Springs Foods Research and Development TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=8.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Clear Springs Foods Research and Development falls in its industry

28 Finfish production, farm raisi establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Finfish production, farm raisi employers in Idaho.

Clear Springs Foods Research and Development (28 employees, TCR 3.0) among 14 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 27 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 15 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Clear Springs Foods Research and Development
Clear Springs Foods Research and Development (28 employees, TCR 3.0) among 14 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 27 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Clear Springs Foods Research and Development has more employees than the Finfish production, farm raising median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.4 8.4 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.4 3.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112511 · ID · Buhl

28 Finfish production, farm raising employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 12 employers in Buhl, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Box Canyon Farm 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harvest Select Hatchery 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anchorage Distribution Center 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wally Norenberg Hatchery 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE AgriSource, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danielson Logging Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Agri-Stor Company 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Falls Agronomy 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Processing Plant 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clear Springs Foods, Cutting Plant 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rangen Inc 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charolais Care III, Inc. dba Desert View Care Center of Buhl 87 FTE
NAT-TCR 143 - Sherman 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 208 - Eastgate 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Railway Systems - Charlotte LYNX 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Westin Austin Dt 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1731 Dixie Ave SE Smyrna, GA 30080 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forum Energy Technologies - Davis 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnesota Department of Health - Duluth 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bennett Moving LLC 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.