Firefighting, forest · Idaho

Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association

Orofino, ID · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association runs at 385% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Firefighting, forest workplace, earning a grade F.

Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association: 17.3 TCR = 385% of Firefighting, forest BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association safety composite

Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association: 12.8 → 45.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 45.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2023

Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association's TCR rose 33.1 from 12.8 in 2017 to 45.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115310 · Orofino, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.3 · 385% of ind

  • DART 9.2 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Chloeta
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chloeta (0.6 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association averages 17.3 TCR (385% of the Firefighting, forest BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association TCR series: 2017=12.8 · 2018=18.2 · 2019=12.1 · 2020=5 · 2022=10 · 2023=45.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association falls in its industry

84 Firefighting, forest establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Firefighting, forest employers in Idaho.

Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association (27 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association
Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association (27 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association has fewer employees than the Firefighting, forest median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 45.9 9.2 10 0 0
2022 10.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2019 12.1 0.0 3 0 0
2018 18.2 6.0 6 0 0
2017 12.8 6.4 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115310 · ID · Orofino

84 Firefighting, forest employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 13 employers in Orofino, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chloeta 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calaveras Healthy Impact Product Solutions 19.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lomakatsi Restoration Project 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ash Creek Forest Management 21.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clear Springs Foods Clear Lake Farm 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITC Services- Jerome 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hansen Agronomy 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE 00202 SHELLEY OFFICE 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clearwater Valley Hospital & Clinics 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clearwater Valley Health 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nightforce Optics 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lightforce USA, Inc. dba Nightforce Optics - Orofino 120 FTE
NAT-TCR Clarkfield Care Center 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Linda Manor Assisted Living Center 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 129 Santa Ana 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Excelsior Springs Seating Systems 17.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Portland Place 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Integrated Wood Components inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compassus - Allentown 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE wallach iron and metal co inc 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.