Retirement communities, continuing care · Massachusetts

Linda Manor Assisted Living Center

Leeds, MA · ~69 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Linda Manor Assisted Living Center runs at 456% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Linda Manor Assisted Living Center: 17.3 TCR = 456% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Linda Manor Assisted Living Center safety composite

Linda Manor Assisted Living Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2016→2023

Linda Manor Assisted Living Center injury rate improved

Linda Manor Assisted Living Center's TCR fell 5.7 from 11.4 in 2016 to 5.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 34.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.4 · 2022=34.8 · 2023=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Leeds, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.3 · 456% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #73/80
  • PHOTO 'The Blake at Charlo…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 'The Blake at Charlottesville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Linda Manor Assisted Living Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Linda Manor Assisted Living Center averages 17.3 TCR (456% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Linda Manor Assisted Living Center TCR series: 2016=11.4 · 2022=34.8 · 2023=5.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Linda Manor Assisted Living Center falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 80 Retirement communities, contin employers in Massachusetts.

Linda Manor Assisted Living Center (69 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Linda Manor Assisted Living Center
Linda Manor Assisted Living Center (69 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Linda Manor Assisted Living Center has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.8 3.8 2 1 0
2022 34.8 32.8 2 15 0
2016 11.4 9.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MA · Leeds

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 5 employers in Leeds, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 'The Blake at Charlottesville 17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lutheran Crossings at Moorestown 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moravian Hall Square 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nelson Gables 17.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walsh Contracting Corp 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&R Corporation 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5001 Avon 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE MEC Electrical Contractors Inc 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR 226_330 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linda Manor Extended Care Facility 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Highview of Northampton 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR LINDA MANOR ASSISTED LIVING 73 FTE
NAT-TCR Clarkfield Care Center 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Clearwater-Potlatch Timber Protective Association 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 129 Santa Ana 17.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heartlands Assisted Living at Severna Park 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indiana Precision Forge LLC 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wabln - Border Brokerage Blaine Administration 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE EMS -Cherrywood PT Forest Lake 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.