Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Pennsylvania

Clew Logistics, LLC

Erie, PA · ~72 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clew Logistics, LLC runs at 370% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Clew Logistics, LLC: 24.0 TCR = 370% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clew Logistics, LLC safety composite

Clew Logistics, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Clew Logistics, LLC: 15.6 → 56.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 56.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.89× in 2024

Clew Logistics, LLC's TCR rose 40.9 from 15.6 in 2022 to 56.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Erie, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.0 · 370% of ind

  • DART 45.5 DART
  • RANK #239/243
  • PHOTO CACOR - CORDELIA CEN…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 58 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CACOR - CORDELIA CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Clew Logistics, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clew Logistics, LLC averages 24.0 TCR (370% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clew Logistics, LLC TCR series: 2022=15.6 · 2023=32.4 · 2024=56.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Clew Logistics, LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #239 safest of 243 Express delivery services (exc employers in Pennsylvania.

Clew Logistics, LLC (72 employees, TCR 24.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Clew Logistics, LLC
Clew Logistics, LLC (72 employees, TCR 24.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Clew Logistics, LLC has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 56.5 45.5 33 3 0
2023 32.4 20.5 19 0 0
2022 15.6 15.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · PA · Erie

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 473 employers in Erie, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CACOR - CORDELIA CENTER 24.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Logistics 24.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Axios Logistics LLC 24.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Whippz Delivery Services 24.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Esbenshade Mount Joy 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maple Lawn Associates 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Middletown Egg 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ken Davis Mushroom Farms 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Erie, PA 5,403 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Hamot 2,675 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wabtec-Erie 2,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAINT VINCENT HOSPITAL 2,135 FTE
NAT-TCR The Fifty Sonesta Select 24.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ravena 24.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakland Collection 24.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hayward hills 24.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE DFine1 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Millers Health and Rehab 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paragon Painting & Waterproofing 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE 127 Orlando Fl 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.