Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · North Carolina

Summit Logistics

Asheville, NC · ~54 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Summit Logistics runs at 370% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Summit Logistics: 24.1 TCR = 370% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Summit Logistics safety composite

Summit Logistics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 25.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Summit Logistics: 12.8 → 35.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 35.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2024

Summit Logistics's TCR rose 22.4 from 12.8 in 2022 to 35.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Asheville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.1 · 370% of ind

  • DART 25.9 DART
  • RANK #211/214
  • PHOTO Clew Logistics, LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clew Logistics, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Summit Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Summit Logistics averages 24.1 TCR (370% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Summit Logistics TCR series: 2022=12.8 · 2023=24.2 · 2024=35.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Summit Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #211 safest of 214 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in North Carolina.

Summit Logistics (54 employees, TCR 24.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Summit Logistics
Summit Logistics (54 employees, TCR 24.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Summit Logistics has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 35.2 25.9 19 0 0
2023 24.2 22.3 13 0 0
2022 12.8 12.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NC · Asheville

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clew Logistics, LLC 24.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Axios Logistics LLC 24.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CACOR - CORDELIA CENTER 24.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Whippz Delivery Services 24.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE ER LEWIS CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elizabethtown 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Raleigh North 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31045 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR CW Bell Logistics LLC 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Siskiyou County Health & Human Services Agency - SSD 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Emerald Springs Senior Living 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6957-TYS 24.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dfa-Itc - Minneapolis Mn 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE ERMCO 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACI Coatings LLC 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tecstone Granite USA Ltd 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.