Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Close to Home

Name: Close to Home Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Tomah, WI · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.3
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Close to Home runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Close to Home: 2.3 TCR = 61% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Close to Home safety composite

Close to Home scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2023

Close to Home injury rate improved

Close to Home's TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Tomah, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 61% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #31/273
PHOTO Ghent Assisted Living
BOOK 2y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ghent Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.3
Ghent Assisted

2.3
Brookdale Bris

2.3
65010 FOX HILL

2.3
The Bridge at

2.3

What this shows Close to Home averages 2.3 TCR (61% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Close to Home TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Close to Home falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Close to Home (29 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Close to Home has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2016	4.6	0.0	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Tomah

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 61 employers in Tomah, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Ghent Assisted Living	GHENT, NY	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Brookdale Bristol	BRISTOL, VA	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	65010 FOX HILL	BETHESDA, MD	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	The Bridge at Mount Vernon	MOUNT VERNON, WA	2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Rhinelander Ag Research	RHINELANDER	29 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Habelman Bros. Company - Millston	BLACK RIVER FALLS	29 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Evergreen Nursery Company, Inc.	STURGEON BAY	29 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Majestic View Dairy	LANCASTER	29 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 6085	Tomah	819 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6085	Tomah	791 FTE
CITY-NEAR	The Toro Company - Tomah Manufacturing Plant	Tomah	772 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Tomah IG	Tomah	513 FTE
NAT-TCR	The Orthopaedic Institute of Western Kentucky	Paducah, KY	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Athens, 63	Athens, NY	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Division II Construction Company, Inc.	Tucson, AZ	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal - Surfaces	Youngstown, OH	2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Grand Emerald Place	South Bend, IN	29 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Atek Electric, LLC	Bowling Green, KY	29 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Peconic Land Trust	Southampton, NY	29 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Havertys Furniture	Jacksonville, FL	29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.