Nursing homes · Alabama

Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Scottsboro, AL · ~136 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center: 14.7 TCR = 226% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center safety composite

Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 25.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center: 3.2 → 25.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 33.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.74× in 2023

Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's TCR rose 22.4 from 3.2 in 2016 to 25.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 33.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Scottsboro, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.7 · 226% of ind

  • DART 25.6 DART
  • RANK #227/269
  • PHOTO Essentia Virginia Ca…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~136 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Essentia Virginia Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center averages 14.7 TCR (226% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=31 · 2021=13.6 · 2022=33.4 · 2023=25.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #227 safest of 269 Nursing homes employers in Alabama.

Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center (136 employees, TCR 14.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center (136 employees, TCR 14.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 25.6 25.6 2 36 0
2022 33.4 32.0 8 41 0
2021 13.6 13.6 4 15 0
2020 31.0 29.4 2 37 0
2019 4.2 1.7 5 0 0
2018 3.4 2.5 4 0 0
2017 3.2 0.0 4 0 0
2016 3.2 1.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · AL · Scottsboro

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 34 employers in Scottsboro, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Essentia Virginia Care Center 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadowbrook Health and Rehab 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ozark Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aurora Health & Rehabilitation Suites 14.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE AL030 Fayette Sawmill 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper - Decatur, Alabama 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2489 Caldwell Court 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central States Manufacturing - Jasper 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCOTTSBORO AL 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maples Industries 1,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heat Transfer Products Group, LLC 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maples Industries Plant Three Location 434 FTE
NAT-TCR Yummy.com SL 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Meadowbrook Health and Rehab 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HG1022 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 352 14.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parkdale America LLC Plant 7 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Police 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flexicon Corporation 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michael Facchiano Contracting, Inc. 136 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.