Skilled nursing facilities · Georgia

Meadowbrook Health and Rehab

Tucker, GA · ~105 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meadowbrook Health and Rehab runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Meadowbrook Health and Rehab: 14.7 TCR = 226% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meadowbrook Health and Rehab safety composite

Meadowbrook Health and Rehab scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2023

Meadowbrook Health and Rehab injury rate improved

Meadowbrook Health and Rehab's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.8 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 48.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.8 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=13.2 · 2021=24.3 · 2022=48.5 · 2023=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Tucker, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.7 · 226% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #197/259
  • PHOTO Essentia Virginia Ca…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Essentia Virginia Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Meadowbrook Health and Rehab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meadowbrook Health and Rehab averages 14.7 TCR (226% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meadowbrook Health and Rehab TCR series: 2017=3.8 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=13.2 · 2021=24.3 · 2022=48.5 · 2023=3.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Meadowbrook Health and Rehab falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #197 safest of 259 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Georgia.

Meadowbrook Health and Rehab (105 employees, TCR 14.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Meadowbrook Health and Rehab
Meadowbrook Health and Rehab (105 employees, TCR 14.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Meadowbrook Health and Rehab has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.2 3.2 3 0 0
2022 48.5 47.2 2 36 0
2021 24.3 20.4 11 8 0
2020 13.2 11.0 4 8 0
2019 4.9 4.9 5 0 0
2018 5.1 4.1 5 0 0
2017 3.8 1.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · GA · Tucker

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 132 employers in Tucker, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Essentia Virginia Care Center 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ozark Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aurora Health & Rehabilitation Suites 14.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE STEWART BROS., INC. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta West Carpets LLC 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aflac Inc - CCorp 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Roofing Plant 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Ortho and Spine Hospital 1,402 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Ortho and Spine Hospital - EHC 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR Williams Plant Services, LLC (All Locations) 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA.TUCKE.9 - Ricoh Usa, Inc 445 FTE
NAT-TCR Yummy.com SL 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cloverdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HG1022 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Abel Recon 14.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Norwich #161 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Montrose #185 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hanes Erie, Inc. 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2032 - Modesto 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.