Airport baggage handling services · North Carolina

CLT_UTILITY

Charlotte, NC · ~310 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

CLT_UTILITY runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Airport baggage handling services workplace, earning a grade D.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
avg TCR · per 100 workers
4.5
industry benchmark (BLS)
29
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares CLT_UTILITY's OSHA Total Case Rate of 7.1 to the Airport baggage handling services BLS benchmark of 4.5 (158% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

CLT_UTILITY's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 4.5 industry benchmark.

456789 20192020 8.14.5 Industry benchmarkCLT_UTILITY TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 488119.

Where CLT_UTILITY falls in its industry

1,731 Airport baggage handling servi establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 58 Airport baggage handling servi employers in North Carolina.

Trend analysis for CLT_UTILITY

Between 2019 and 2020, CLT_UTILITY's Total Case Rate worsened from 6.0 to 8.1 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 35% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2019, at a TCR of 6.0, while 2020 saw the highest rate, at 8.1, a spread of 2.1 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, CLT_UTILITY recorded 29 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 29 injuries shown on this page for CLT_UTILITY are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 488119 - Airport baggage handling services.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2020)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

10 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 393,751 hours worked = 5.08 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
CLT_UTILITY (this establishment) 7.09 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) industry avg 4.50 BLS IIF, NAICS 488119
North Carolina state avg (all industries) 3.89 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by CLT_UTILITY to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.1 5.1 16 0 0
2019 6.0 3.7 13 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on CLT_UTILITY's reported OSHA injury record versus its Airport baggage handling services peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 158% of the Airport baggage handling services benchmark, CLT_UTILITY reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Airport baggage handling services sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CLT_UTILITY's safety grade?
CLT_UTILITY has a safety grade of D (Poor Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 7.1 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 4.5 for Airport baggage handling services.
How many injuries has CLT_UTILITY reported?
CLT_UTILITY has reported 29 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2020, 2019). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within North Carolina, and by nearby establishments in Charlotte - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.