Bars, concrete reinforcing, manufacturing · South Carolina

CMC Rebar Columbia

Columbia, SC · ~31 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMC Rebar Columbia runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bars, concrete reinforcing, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

CMC Rebar Columbia: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Bars, concrete reinforcing, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMC Rebar Columbia safety composite

CMC Rebar Columbia scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CMC Rebar Columbia held a steady TCR band

CMC Rebar Columbia's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Columbia, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/22
  • PHOTO Ratliff Industries, …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ratliff Industries, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

CMC Rebar Columbia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMC Rebar Columbia averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Bars, concrete reinforcing, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMC Rebar Columbia TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CMC Rebar Columbia falls in its industry

1,491 Bars, concrete reinforcing, ma establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 22 Bars, concrete reinforcing, ma employers in South Carolina.

CMC Rebar Columbia (31 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CMC Rebar Columbia
CMC Rebar Columbia (31 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

CMC Rebar Columbia has fewer employees than the Bars, concrete reinforcing, manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.9 5.9 2 0 0
2020 6.1 3.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · SC · Columbia

1,491 Bars, concrete reinforcing, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ratliff Industries, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harris Arizona Rebar - Phoenix 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Harris Rebar Midwest LLC-St Louis Missouri 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steel Fabricators of Monroe 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE SC Operations 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Little River Electric Cooperative, Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE GreenWood, Inc. - GE Gas Turbine 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Wastewater Treatment Plant 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR South 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Family Resource Center 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MBM-3 Santa Ana 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vista Del Sol Postacute Care (Ceres) 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Price 2813 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE STS Operating - Grand Prairie 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE STS Operating - Baton Rouge 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Louis - 7th Street 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.