Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

The Legacy of Camden

Camden, SC · ~31 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
34.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Legacy of Camden runs at 909% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Legacy of Camden: 34.5 TCR = 909% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Legacy of Camden safety composite

The Legacy of Camden scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 34.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22.3

2021→2024

The Legacy of Camden injury rate improved

The Legacy of Camden's TCR fell 22.3 from 43.5 in 2021 to 21.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 55.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=43.5 · 2022=55.4 · 2023=39.0 · 2024=21.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Camden, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 34.5 · 909% of ind

  • DART 12.7 DART
  • RANK #107/107
  • PHOTO Carlton Senior Livin…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carlton Senior Living Davis (4.6 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Legacy of Camden in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Legacy of Camden averages 34.5 TCR (909% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

The Legacy of Camden TCR series: 2021=43.5 · 2022=55.4 · 2023=39 · 2024=21.2 · BLS 3.8

Where The Legacy of Camden falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

The Legacy of Camden (31 employees, TCR 34.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate The Legacy of Camden
The Legacy of Camden (31 employees, TCR 34.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Legacy of Camden has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 21.2 12.7 5 0 0
2023 39.0 39.0 4 5 0
2022 55.4 55.4 2 10 0
2021 43.5 43.5 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Camden

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 52 employers in Camden, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carlton Senior Living Davis 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Residence of Fosston 29.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chandler Place Independent Living 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 7238 L&W Supply 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Legacy of Orangeburg 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE FT1 -Fort Mill 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE WOFFORD COLLEGE ** 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR MUSC Health Kershaw 2,555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kershaw County School District 1,570 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kershaw County Government 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kershaw Health Hospital 663 FTE
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mayfair Village Retirement 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilmington NC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMI Metals NJ 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tom Mayo Construction, Inc. 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.